Skip to content 
Choosing an acuity system is a clinical and operational decision. The right chart should suit the room, support repeatable testing, fit the way practitioners work, and connect cleanly with the broader refraction set-up.
For optometry clinics, ophthalmology rooms and optical practices, the chart is part of the daily patient flow. It affects how staff move through pre-testing, how clinicians compare results over time, and how well each test room can be used across different appointment types.
Key Highlights
- Snellen charts remain practical for general screening and routine acuity checks in many clinical rooms.
- LogMAR charts support more structured acuity recording, often useful for monitoring change and clinical comparison.
- Digital systems can reduce chart handling, support multiple test formats and improve day-to-day workflow.
- Space-saving systems are useful when a clinic cannot support a full 6 metre testing lane.
- Integration with refractors can help standardise test delivery and reduce manual steps.
- The best choice depends on room length, patient volume, test type, reporting method and service support.
When to Use Snellen vs LogMAR
Snellen and LogMAR charts both assess visual acuity, but they do so in different formats. The right choice depends on what the clinic needs to record and how often results need to be compared over time.
Snellen Charts for Routine Clinical Use
A Snellen chart is familiar, simple and widely used across optometry and ophthalmology settings. It is often suitable for:
- General acuity screening
- Routine eye examinations
- Small practices seeking a simple chart option
- Rooms using fixed 3 metre or 6 metre testing distances
- Support spaces where a low-complexity visual acuity check is required
A traditional eye test chart may be wall-mounted, projected, printed, cardboard-based or displayed through a digital chart system. For clinics seeking a simple physical option, 3 Metre Cardboard Eye Charts may suit rooms with shorter working distances.
Snellen testing is common in clinical practice, yet the steps between acuity lines are not always equal. This can make small changes harder to compare with precision, mainly when monitoring progression or treatment response.
LogMAR Charts for Structured Measurement
LogMAR stands for logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. A logmar chart usually provides a more uniform layout, with consistent letter spacing and line progression. ETDRS charts, which follow LogMAR design principles, are widely used in clinical research and are often treated as the standard for best-corrected visual acuity testing in research settings.
A LogMAR format may be useful for:
- Monitoring patients over time
- Refractive surgery follow-up
- Clinical trial-style recording
- Low vision assessment
- Audits where repeatability matters
- Specialist rooms where finer acuity tracking is needed
Research comparing ETDRS and Snellen testing has found that measured change can differ across baseline acuity groups, which supports the need to choose a chart method that matches the clinic’s reporting purpose.
Quick Comparison: Snellen and LogMAR
| Chart Type | Best Suited To | Main Strength | Main Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Snellen |
Routine acuity checks |
Familiar and simple |
Less uniform line spacing |
|
LogMAR |
Follow-up and structured monitoring |
More consistent scoring |
May need more staff familiarity |
|
ETDRS-style LogMAR |
Research-style testing and detailed comparison |
Standardised format |
More specific set-up requirements |
|
Digital LogMAR |
Clinics needing flexible test formats |
Multiple charts in one system |
Depends on calibration and correct set-up |
Clinics that mainly perform routine refraction may use Snellen-style charts every day. Clinics with a high number of post-operative, low vision, disease monitoring or shared-care patients may benefit from LogMAR capability.
Digital vs Traditional Charts
The choice between traditional and digital charts is often shaped by patient volume, room use and the level of control a practice wants across each test lane.
Traditional Charts
Traditional charts include printed, cardboard, illuminated and projected formats. They are simple, familiar and often lower in upfront cost.
A traditional eye chart may suit:
- A spare consulting room
- A smaller independent clinic
- Screening use
- Backup testing
- Paediatric or literacy-based acuity checks
- Temporary rooms or outreach clinics
The main benefit is simplicity. There is little to learn, and staff can use the chart without digital controls. The main limit is flexibility. If a clinic needs multiple chart types, randomised letters, binocular tests or integrated refraction control, a fixed chart may become restrictive.
Digital Acuity Systems
A digital acuity system displays charts on a screen, often with multiple optotype and test options. Digital systems can help clinics change test types without swapping physical charts. They may support Snellen, LogMAR, astigmatism, binocular balance, red-green, fixation and other tests, depending on the model.
BOC lists the NIDEK SC-1600 as a standalone visual measurement system with a high-resolution LCD screen and selectable working distances from 3 to 7 metres. The same BOC category page notes compatibility with NIDEK RT5100 and RT3100 smart refractors. The NIDEK SC-1600 is a relevant option for clinics seeking digital chart control in a standard consulting room.
Digital systems may support:
- Faster chart selection
- Reduced manual chart changes
- Consistent test presentation
- Multiple test formats from one device
- Better use across different practitioners
- Cleaner connection with refractor workflows
Digital chart accuracy depends on correct calibration. Viewing distance and optotype size need to match the room set-up. Optonet’s calibration guidance states that visual acuity chart calibration should include checking the letter height and measuring the viewing distance from the chart to the patient’s eyes. A digital chart can be efficient, but only when installed, checked and used correctly.
Comparison: Digital and Traditional Options
| Feature | Traditional Chart | Digital Chart |
|---|---|---|
|
Upfront cost |
Usually lower |
Usually higher |
|
Test range |
Fixed or limited |
Broader, model-dependent |
|
Chart randomisation |
Limited |
Often available |
|
Room flexibility |
Distance-specific |
Some systems allow selectable distances |
|
Integration |
Usually manual |
May connect with refractors |
|
Service needs |
Low |
Requires technical support |
|
Best fit |
Basic rooms and backup use |
Busy clinics and integrated refraction lanes |
Clinics with steady patient volume may find a digital system easier to manage across the full day. Clinics with lower volume or backup rooms may prefer a traditional chart for simple acuity testing.
Choosing by Room Size and Workflow
Room size is one of the first checks when selecting an eye test chart. A clinic may prefer a 6 metre lane, but many modern rooms are shorter. A careful set-up review can prevent errors in viewing distance, mounting height, mirror placement or patient seating position.
Full-Length Rooms
A full-length refraction room can support traditional 6 metre acuity testing. This set-up may suit practices with:
- Larger consulting rooms
- Long-standing refraction lanes
- Existing projector systems
- Standardised patient chair positions
- Multiple clinicians using the same protocol
The benefit is familiarity. The limit is space. In high-rent locations or compact medical suites, a full-length room may reduce the number of usable consulting spaces.
Three Metre Rooms
A 3 metre room can be practical for many clinics when charts are scaled correctly. A 3 metre visual acuity chart should be selected for that distance, not printed or mounted without checking scale. The chart must match the working distance used in the room.
For practices searching for eye charts australia, BOC’s visual acuity category includes chart and system options for local clinics, including Visual Acuity Charts across traditional and digital formats.
A 3 metre set-up may suit:
- Compact optometry clinics
- Secondary rooms
- Screening spaces
- Rural clinics with limited floor area
- Clinics adding capacity within an existing footprint
Space-Saving Systems
Space-saving systems are built for rooms that cannot support a standard testing lane. These systems may use optical design, mirrors or compact display positioning to support a refracting distance beyond the physical room length.
BOC lists the NIDEK SSC-370 as requiring only 1.1 metres to test at a 6 metre refraction distance, with use in a 2.5 metre room. The same product information states that it includes Night Mode and LogMAR chart capability. The NIDEK SSC-370 may suit clinics seeking a compact chart system for tight room planning.
A space-saving chart may be suitable when:
- The consulting room is short
- A full 6 metre lane is not possible
- The clinic wants a compact refraction room
- The practice is adding another consulting lane
- Room turnover and patient flow are key concerns
Workflow Questions Before Buying
Before choosing a chart, the practice should review:
- How many acuity tests are performed each day?
- Do clinicians record Snellen, LogMAR or both?
- Are paediatric, low vision or illiterate E charts needed?
- Will the same room be used for refraction and screening?
- Does the system need to connect with a refractor?
- Is the room fixed, or likely to change during a future fit-out?
- Who will service and calibrate the system?
A clinic that sees a broad patient mix may benefit from a system with multiple chart types. A clinic with one main practitioner and a stable workflow may need a simpler set-up.
Integration with Refraction Systems
Chart selection should not sit apart from the rest of the room. The best acuity system is the one that works cleanly with the chair, stand, refractor, patient position and practitioner workflow.
Why Integration Matters
Integrated chart and refractor systems can reduce manual steps. This may help with:
- Consistent chart selection
- Cleaner practitioner workflow
- Less time moving between controls
- Easier testing across repeat appointments
- Better room use in high-volume clinics
BOC’s SC-1600 information notes that the system can integrate with NIDEK intelligent refractors for smoother examinations. BOC’s RT-3100 product information states that the smart refractor can connect with NIDEK SC1600 series acuity charts.
For practices already using NIDEK equipment, matching the acuity system with the refractor platform may reduce friction across the consulting room.
What to Check Before Integration
Before selecting an integrated chart system, confirm:
- Refractor compatibility
- Control method
- Chart type availability
- Working distance options
- Software or firmware requirements
- Service access
- Staff training needs
- Mounting and cabling requirements
An integrated system should save steps, not create extra training barriers. The goal is practical consistency across daily testing.
Common Buying Mistakes
Selecting an acuity chart may seem simple. In practice, small set-up errors can affect repeatability and workflow. The most common mistakes are usually planning issues rather than product issues.
1. Choosing the Chart Before Measuring the Room
The testing distance must be known before the chart is selected. A chart scaled for one distance should not be used at another distance without proper adjustment. The room length, mirror path, patient eye position and screen placement all need to be checked.
2. Ignoring Calibration
Digital charts need correct set-up. Physical charts need correct mounting, lighting and distance. If calibration is missed, results may look consistent inside the room but still be inaccurate against the intended chart scale.
Computerised distance visual acuity systems continue to be studied for repeatability and validity. A 2025 multicentre study assessed a computerised distance visual acuity chart system with 481 participants aged 7 to 88 years, showing the ongoing clinical focus on standardised digital acuity measurement.
3. Selecting Snellen When LogMAR Recording Is Needed
Snellen may be enough for general use. It may be less suitable where small acuity changes need to be recorded with more structure. If the clinic monitors post-operative patients, low vision patients or disease progression, LogMAR may be a better fit.
4. Overbuying for a Low-Use Room
A premium digital system may not be needed in every room. Some practices may use a mix:
- Digital integrated chart in the main refraction room
- Cardboard or illuminated chart in the secondary room
- Space-saving chart in compact rooms
- Paediatric or symbol charts for selected patients
This approach can help control capital spend and still support clinical use.
5. Forgetting Service Support
Acuity systems are used daily. If the system fails, the room may lose function. The equipment downtime disrupts patient flow, and clinics value service continuity, loan units, and trusted supplier support.
Supplier selection should cover:
- Installation support
- Training
- Calibration guidance
- Technical servicing
- Spare parts access
- Warranty process
- Local response capacity
Connect with BOC Instruments Today!
The right eye test chart should fit the clinical purpose, room size and daily workflow. Snellen charts remain useful for routine testing. LogMAR charts can support structured follow-up. Digital systems can improve flexibility and integration. Space-saving systems can help practices use compact rooms without losing refraction capability.
For optometrists and practice managers, the buying decision should start with the room and the workflow, then move to chart format, integration and service support. A reliable acuity system is part of a larger clinical set-up, and the right advice can help the practice avoid costly changes after installation.
BOC Instruments supports Australian eye-care professionals with ophthalmic equipment, installation guidance and ongoing service coverage. To review the right acuity chart options for your clinic, request a fit-out consultation with BOC Instruments.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best eye test chart for an optometry clinic?
There is no single best option for every clinic. A routine refraction room may work well with Snellen or digital Snellen formats. A clinic that tracks change over time may need LogMAR. A compact room may need a space-saving system. The right choice depends on room length, workflow, patient mix and integration needs.
Is a digital acuity system better than a printed chart?
A digital system can offer more chart types, chart randomisation and better workflow integration. A printed or cardboard chart can still be suitable for simple acuity testing, backup use or smaller rooms. Digital is not automatically the better choice; it needs correct calibration and support.
When should a clinic use a LogMAR chart?
A logmar chart is useful when the clinic needs more structured acuity recording. This may apply to follow-up care, clinical audits, refractive surgery review, low vision assessment or settings where small changes matter.
Can a 3 metre chart be used in any room?
A 3 metre chart should be used at its intended test distance, with correct mounting and lighting. If the room is shorter or longer, the clinic should select a chart or system suited to that distance.
What does a space-saving chart do?
A space-saving chart supports acuity testing in shorter rooms. It can help clinics create a functional refraction lane where a full testing distance is not physically available.
Should the chart connect with the refractor?
Connection can help in clinics with high patient volume or a preference for integrated room control. It may reduce manual steps and support more consistent testing. Compatibility should be checked before purchase.
How often should acuity systems be checked?
Clinics should check acuity systems when installed, after moving equipment, after service work and at set review points. Digital systems should be checked for viewing distance, optotype size and display set-up. Physical charts should be checked for distance, mounting height, lighting and wear.